Student Loan Defaults Nearly Double
Scores more colleges could face federal restrictions on financial aid once the government starts holding them accountable for their three-year student loan cohort default rates, judging from the first look at three-year rates made public by the U.S. Education Department today. Taken together, the three-year rates are 93 percent higher than the standard two-year rates for for-profit colleges, 63 percent higher for public two-year institutions, and 70 percent higher for private four-year colleges.
The rates released today are informational only, as colleges will not be punished based on their three-year rates until 2014, when the government will have collected and published three consecutive years of data on three-year rates. The release of the data are meant to serve as something of an early warning system for colleges and universities, such that those whose rates would put them at risk of federal penalties might begin to “change their thinking a little bit” about their students’ loan burdens, said Dan Madzelan, acting assistant secretary for postsecondary education at the Education Department.
Cohort default rates represent the proportion of federal loan borrowers who began loan repayments in a given fiscal year and who defaulted on their loans within a defined period that follows (since 1989, that period has been two years). For two decades, the government has used the rates as one high-profile indicator of whether institutions were providing a meaningful education, with the idea that colleges where students were regularly defaulting on their loans were failing to prepare them adequately for jobs that would allow them to pay off their student debt. Colleges and universities with default rates above certain levels risk losing access for their students not only to federally subsidized loans, but also to Pell Grants.
The cohort default rate has come in for criticism from two sides. Officials at for-profit colleges and some other institutions that serve large numbers of students from low-income backgrounds have argued that it is a skewed indicator of institutional quality, disproportionately punishing institutions that enroll more needy students. But consumer protection and student groups have argued that tracking borrowers over only a two-year window failed to account for many defaults, since the average borrower falls into default four years rather than two years after entering repayment, according to several studies.
The latter arguments proved persuasive to Congressional Democrats as they crafted the 2008 renewal of the Higher Education Act, which included a provision to extend to three years from two the period over which the government tracks borrowers’ defaults. Opponents of the change won numerous concessions from Congress aimed at softening the impact of the change. The government will not begin basing colleges’ eligibility for loans and grants on the new three-year rates until 2014, when it has accumulated three full years of three-year rates. The data published today present a three-year rate for the cohort of borrowers who entered repayment in 2006, and examines whether they defaulted by September 2009. It will take until 2014 for the Education Department to have accumulated three full years of three-year rates.
In addition, the Higher Education Opportunity Act raised the level of the default rates that subject colleges to federal restrictions on financial aid. Beginning in 2014, colleges will face restrictions — up to and including being barred from awarding loans — if they have a three-year cohort default rate of 30 percent for three consecutive years, up from the current 25 percent. They will continue to face serious penalties, including being barred from awarding any kind of federal aid, for a default rate over 40 percent in any single year. In making the rates public, Education Department officials sought to play down the imminent risk to colleges with rates at those levels. “It’s important to remember that these rates are purely informational at this point,” said Madzelan, the assistant secretary. “We’re trying to be as forthright and clear and transparent as we can be, with the hope that schools will, as they have been, continue to work to minimize [their default rates]. “It’s not quite, ‘Move along, there’s nothing to see here,’ but there’s no reason for places to panic at this point,” he said.
